The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland, New Zealand.

The stipulated pie-chart elucidates information about the survey report of satisfaction level of people's about the design of Shopping Complex in Auckland,New Zealand and tabular charts manifest similar phenomenon about shops and restaurants. The given data in percentile.

Overall, key points to note all that majority of both sexes satisfied with facilities of shops, restaurants and pattern of shopping complex.

Apropos to the detail of the given charts, that 45% male and 37% female were satisfied with the shops and similar criteria recorded for restaurants that is 55% and 32% by men and women respectively. Interestingly, more than two fifth of people were delighted with its design. Apart from this, one fifth of total fraction were dissatisfied with shops whereas few participants did not give any comments. Subsequently, 17% males and twice of it women's felt very satisfied with services of shops.

Looking at the more precise details of the charts that nearly quarter of gents and 2% greater of it ladies were very satisfied with restaurants while a petty fraction of males nearly 5% and a fifth of women's were not contented with restaurants services. Besides this, nearly equal fraction 15% of Men's and 20% of ladies were not interested to give any opinion. Probing further, to the rest detail that one in ten people were dissatisfied with its design however 1% more of this gave no comments. Additionally, 17% people were very satisfied with the design of shopping complex.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , New
...e design of Shopping Complex in Auckland,New Zealand and tabular charts manifest sim...
^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifest similar phenomenon about shops and restaurants. The given data in percentil...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he given data in percentile. Overall, key points to note all that majority of ...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...harts, that 45% male and 37% female were satisfied with the shops and similar cri...
^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fied with the shops and similar criteria recorded for restaurants that is 55% and...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Looking at the more precise details of the charts that nearly quarter of gen...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arts that nearly quarter of gents and 2% greater of it ladies were very satisfied...
^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re very satisfied with restaurants while a petty fraction of males nearly 5% and ...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mens were not contented with restaurants services. Besides this, nearly equal fra...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, whereas, while, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20746887967 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81224965599 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54356846473 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2192624454 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130994054863 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501925054997 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891705206242 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10816973437 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11313190673 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.