The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables compare the sales of coffee and bananas in five European countries for two years (1999 and 2004). Overall, the sales of coffee increased in 2004 for all countries, while the sales of bananas was down just in town countries. The units are measured in euros in millions.
If we look at the demand of coffee, UK reached to the first place in the list with 20m euros in 2004 from 1.5m euros in 1999. Switzerland was followed UK with 6m euros what was two times more in 2004 than 1999. After that, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden stood in list in series, at 2m, 1.7m and 1m euros respectively in 2004.
In terms of popular of bananas, Switzerland come to the top in 2004 among given categories with 17m euros as well. Then, bananas were more popular in UK in 2004 with 5.5m euros, where as just 4m euros in Belgium in 2004. The sales in Sweden and Denmark were at the last in 2004 with 1m and 0.9m euros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... popular in UK in 2004 with 5.5m euros, where as just 4m euros in Belgium in 2004. The s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he last in 2004 with 1m and 0.9m euros.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31578947368 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1582512899 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520467836257 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.531159324 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177993064251 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868534166845 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859027641347 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14116138423 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932443423475 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.