The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Fairtrade a category of products for which farmers from developing countries have been paid an officially agreed fair price

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. (Fairtrade: a category of products for which farmers from developing countries have been paid an officially agreed fair price.)

The tables describe data on the changes in terms of the Fairtrade export values of tea and pineapples, varying from five different countries, measured in millions of euros, in between two years: 2010 and 2015.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that while all figures for tea in all countries rose, that of pineapple decreased in Norway and German.
In terms of tea, in 2015, France rocketed its imported value of tea, from 2.5 to 21 million euros, surpassing that of Australia, 8 million, to be the country that imported the most tea in 2015. In addition, other countries also had upward trends, but with little increments in the data, with below 5 million through all years of the survey.
Australia tripled its demand of pineapples to 48 million euros in 2015, remaining to be the most pineapples imported country in comparison with others. Following Australia, it was France, with an increment from 2 to 6.5 million euros in 2015. In the same trend, that of the Netherland climbed up from 1.6 to 5 million euros. In contrast, the figures for Norway and German dropped to below 2 million euros in the same years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...surpassing that of Australia, 8 million, to be the country that imported the most...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76649746193 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5521942083 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3323738931 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205705908366 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092782444344 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417290241405 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131618927627 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223749292325 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.