The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The bar chart depicts that income from two different product during the 5 years of period.
It is clear that, highest France people drink tea in 2015 while highest Austrain ate pineapples at lowest rate in 2010.
As the graph shows, According to Tea, the figure for income from this categories increased in all region. France people earned only 2.5 million euros in 2010 before experiencing an increased drastically to 21 millions euro in 2015. Afterwards, Germany, Netherland and Norway had got income from tea at 2.8,2 and 1.8 million euros in 2010 respectively while it almost same for three Nation with 3, 2.7 and 2 million euro respectively. There was 4 million euro could earn in Austraia while the figure of sale doubled to 8 in 2015.
By contrast, Regarding pineapples, The sale of pineapples in Austraia stood at 16 million euro in 2010 which witnessed a three times of its income in 2015 that was highest overall the period. There was only 2 million and 1.6 million euro got from pineapples trade in France and Netherland the trend rose by 4.5 million and 3.4 million in 2015. In terms of Norway and Germany, it had experiencing a 2.8 million and 3 million euro in 2010 then it decreased to 2 million and 1.9 million respectively in 2015. Among all the nations, Netherland had least sales figure from pineapples in 2010 which was replaced by germany in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'product' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'products'.
Suggestion: products
... depicts that income from two different product during the 5 years of period. It is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...e 5 years of period. It is clear that, highest France people drink tea in 2015 while h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ding to Tea, the figure for income from this categories increased in all region. Fra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Nations'.
Suggestion: Nations
...ectively while it almost same for three Nation with 3, 2.7 and 2 million euro respecti...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... three times of its income in 2015 that was highest overall the period. There was only 2 mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...2015. Among all the nations, Netherland had least sales figure from pineapples in 2010 wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77405857741 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59437169994 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497907949791 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9302044403 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139840525748 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750386279438 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451672970033 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889819483206 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054227210565 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.