The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The table depicts the data regarding sales of tea and Pineapples in millions of euros in five European countries (France, Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Norway) in the years 2010 and 2015.
Overall, Austria was the highest trader for both in 2010 and also remained at the topmost position for the sales of pineapples whereas in case of tea it was replaced by France for the sales in 2015.
In terms of the business of tea, Austria earned 4 millions of euros in 2010 which was significantly doubled in 2015. The noticeable rise of 18.5 million for the sales of tea in France was observed in 2015 as compared to only 2.5 million in 2010. However, the figures for the Netherlands was slightly improved to 0.7 million and also for Germany and Norway it was minimally grown up to only 0.2 million in 2015.
Similarly, the Austrian overwhelming sold the Pineapples in both years which accounted up to 16 and 48 million respectively. Moreover, the figures for France and the Netherlands was also almost tripled in 2015 while the reverse had been observed in case of the rest two countries that their sales were moderately declined up 0.8 million for Norway and 1.1 million for Germany.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
... of the business of tea, Austria earned 4 millions of euros in 2010 which was significantly d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80975609756 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60327894645 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4828965387 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188685907842 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118777631913 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090362659929 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158027615797 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916009499506 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.