The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares changes in sales of Fairtrade - labelled tea and pineapples in five European countries between 2010 and 2015.
Overall, it is evident that there was a significant increase in the sales of Fairtrade-labelled both tea and pineapples over the period shown. We can also see that France had accounted for the largest amount of Fairtrade - labeled tea trading and the figures for pineapples were in Australia over both two years.
In 2010, Sales of Fairtrade- labeled tea in Austria was the highest, with 4 million euros, while these figures for Germany and France were 2.8 million and 2.5 million euros. Over the following 5 years, there was a rise gradually, France’s trading of fairtrade-labeled tea increased in over eight times, stood at 21 million of euros. While Austria's tea of sale doubled, Germany had a slight increase in 2015. In terms of pineapples, in 2010, Australia had 16 million euros, higher than other countries, with 2,8 million euros in Norway, 2 million euros in France and 3 million of euros in Germany. By 2015, almost countries had risen considerably, while Austria had the strongest increased in tea, about threefold of those figures in 2010. The number of France and Netherlands were 6.5 and 5 million euros in that order.
On the other hand, Norway had the smallest amount of Fairtrade-labelled tea sales in 2010, and remained stable this position over the five year period, with 2 million of euros in 2015. There was a fall in pineapples in both Norway and Germany, with approximately to 2 and 1,9 million euros respectively in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 1,9 million euros respectively in 2010
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99248120301 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92304964079 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477443609023 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7076905492 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206411073705 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10877926693 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859207004848 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186078301242 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08982713285 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.