The tables below show the forecasted and actual sales of a bicycle shop over four months.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given tables depict a bicycle shop’s projected and actual sales for different items in the first four months of a year: January, February, March, and April.
While the shop’s total sales predicted to increase each month, they in fact successively did not reach their forecasts. Spare parts and repairs performed well in all four months with an exception in February and April for spare parts; however, it was not followed by new bicycles and clothing actual sales. In March and April, A new form of revenue maker was introduced.
The shop forecasted new bicycles sales to rise each month to $20000 by April, but the actual sales were under its target which only reached $18090. Similarly, Clothing sales which were projected to increase from $4500 in January to $6000 in April, they in fact had a 1350 actual sales reduction from $4550 in January to $3220 in April.
In contrast, spare parts and repairs actual sales showed good performance in the first four months. Sales of spare parts were projected to slightly rise each month, and the actual sales stood at upper their forecasted sales except in February and April which only performed at $4160 and $3220 respectively. Following the spare part sales, repairs sales depicted outstanding performance in all months which reached $40, $870, $1000, and $330 upper the forecasts.
In March and April a new category was introduced, namely bicycle hires, which contributed $850 and $1100 to shop’s total sales
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, similarly, well, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00819672131 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53253486995 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487704918033 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3207142794 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184370238944 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934592848056 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603605347328 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121630023618 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336303877328 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.