The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city. Units are measures in percentage.
The tables illustrate the proportion of people assessing six aspects of one city’s life as good, average, or bad, in 1980 and 2010.
Overall, healthcare, education, and the environment were given the highest scores in both years, and transport facilities received the lowest. Meanwhile, education’s rating rose over the period, while that of transportation fell.
In 1980, people rated education, healthcare and environment the highest with over 80% approving of healthcare, while the other two had figures of 72%. Under 10% of surveyed people thought these services were bad. As for shops and employment, they both had 64% and 62% approval, respectively, and around 23% said they were average. Only a half of those surveyed gave the highest score to transport, with roughly a third stating it was bad.
Turning to 2010, the most significant increase was seen in education, as over 80% were happy with it, whereas the rating of healthcare fell to 74%. The employment situation improved, as in 2010, almost three quarters of those asked expressed satisfaction. In contrast, approval of the transport facilities fell to 39% and a similar proportion stated it was bad. Finally, with regard to the environment and shopping, their approval levels both remained relatively unchanged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, third, whereas, while, as for, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33990147783 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91646417844 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5960591133 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5737468691 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5454545455 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903665686531 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361542381045 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631376430907 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759342763695 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897503871445 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.