The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate the total expenditure as a percentage for a certain school in UK annually, for 3 decades.
Overall, in 1991, large sums of money, which is half of the total expenditure was used for payment of teachers' salaries, whilst a small percentage was spent on insurance in the first decade. It is noticeable, teachers' salaries had the highest budget, compared to insurance which was the least throughout the period.
Large sums of money was used for tutor's payment throughout the decades. In 1991, half of the total spending for the school went to the teacher's salaries. Payments of insurance was marginally done, as it had little expenditure throughout the period, whilst in 1981, 2% of the money was spent on insurance.
Furthermore, there was an increase on all expenses from 1981 to 1991, except for furniture which decreased by 10% from 15% to 50 in 1991 and 6% fall for other workers salaries from 28% to 22%. In the last decade, the was a huge rise of money used for furniture from 5% to 23% in 2001, as well as an increase in expenditure for insurance from 3% to 8%. On the other hand, there was a 5% reduction for the money used for payment of teachers salaries from 50% to 45%, as other salary payments and resources dropped from 22% to 15% and 20% to 9% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce was marginally done, as it had little expenditure throughout the period, whils...
^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased by 10% from 15% to 50 in 1991 and 6% fall for other workers salaries from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, well, except for, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67672413793 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6746896594 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461206896552 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2992791483 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988276914141 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578458101943 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693518741554 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876985800267 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703555765786 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.