The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts illustrate the percentage of annual expenditures on five different areas of one school in the UK in the years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that teacher’s earnings consisted of the majority of budget and almost remained stable, while the spending on the other domains varied during the given period.
Teacher’s salaries commenced at 40% in 1981. It comprised the half of the budget of the school in 1991; however, this figure had decreased to 45% by following decade. In 1991, the school also spend similar amount of money on furniture and equipment and resources, such as books, at 15%. Although the former had decreased to 5%, it rose to roughly one-fourths. On the other hand, the latter first increased by 5% which ended with 9% in 2001. Regarding the salaries of other employees, it nearly halved throughout the period, from 28% to 15%. Finally, there was the least expenditure in insurance though, it had grown by four times, from 2% to 8% by 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | hau le | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | hau le | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | trikhung777 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 89 | view |
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community others fear that it is lowering the q 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- In many countries youngsters protest against the system by damaging public properties Is this justified 81
- By punishing murderer with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. 61
- These days, people work in more than one job, and often change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6263306069 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641176470588 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4476556141 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162887742317 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597513166258 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724779762824 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122428749282 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945153100098 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.