The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts provide information about how total school spending of a UK school percentagewise was changed in the years 1981,1991, and 2001. Overall, insurance contributed the least to the total school spending during the period shown in the charts. In comparison, for the same period teacher’s salaries become the largest costs segment.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1981 teacher’s salaries sector accounted for almost the half of total school spending, 40% and increased in 1991 which accounted exactly the half, 50% and remained the highest in 2001 with 45%. Another sector with the same trend was resource segment. In 1981 it was 15%, and had a slight growth of 5% in 1991, but it fell to 9% in 2001. Insurance had a progressive growth in all three years. It was 2% in 1981, and increased of only 1% in 1991, and accounted for 8% in 2001.
By contrast furniture and equipment had a dramatically decline in 1991 by 15% to 5%, and a significantly growth in 2001 with 23%. In comparison, other workers’ salaries slightly decreased by 1981 to 2001. It was 28% in 1981, decreased of 6% in 1991, and accounted for only 15% in 2001, almost the half then of the beginning of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 1991, and accounted for 8% in 2001. By contrast furniture and equipment had ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 41, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...By contrast furniture and equipment had a dramatically decline in 1991 by 15% to 5%, and a significant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...cally decline in 1991 by 15% to 5%, and a significantly growth in 2001 with 23%. In comparison, other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lf then of the beginning of the period.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81990521327 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86437907064 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488151658768 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7343355463 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4545454545 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233369971837 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999683610999 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946565451457 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178596232939 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694862083948 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.