The three Pie Charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001?
The given three circular charts ilastrate the information about compare the total expenditure of five different amount for outer UK school in year: (1981), (1991) and (2001) the data is celebrated in presentum which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, In year (1981) in (1991) furniture and equipment expenditure was discreased from less than fifth to more than atiny fraction, moreover then syned unclear a quarter in 2001, however the expenditure of insurance engineer (1981) (1991) and (2001) was (2%), (3%) and (8%) respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, in year (1981) expenditure of other workers salary was less than guater after that, teacher salary was been most effected with more than one fourth, that was highest expenditure in UK during the year of (1991), In addition to this, during the year (2001) lowest spending was insurance however highest spending had been teacher salary with more than one fourth, furthermore in year (1981) other workers salary, resources e.g books and furniture and equipment was (28%) (15%) and (15%) respectively.
Overall it is evident insurance spending increase in year by year with 2% to 8 % however, Teacher salary was been in mostly expenditure during the three different year and other spending was fractuated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...the total expenditure of five different amount for outer UK school in year: 1981, 1991...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ance engineer 1981 1991 and 2001 was 2%, 3% and 8% respectively. As far as trend...
^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...that, in year 1981 expenditure of other workers salary was less than guater after that,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
... than guater after that, teacher salary was been most effected with more than one fourth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ffected with more than one fourth, that was highest expenditure in UK during the year of 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one fourth, that was highest expenditure in UK during the year of 1991, In additi...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of 1991, In addition to this, during the year 2001 lowest spending was insurance ...
^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... fourth, furthermore in year 1981 other workers salary, resources e.g books and furnitu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es e.g books and furniture and equipment was 28% 15% and 15% respectively. Overa...
^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dent insurance spending increase in year by year with 2% to 8 % however, Teacher ...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
... with 2% to 8 % however, Teacher salary was been in mostly expenditure during the three ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69047618806 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.152344679 43.030603864 286% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 264.0 112.824112599 234% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.0 22.9334400587 227% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.25 5.23603664747 272% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169054336584 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128940790455 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571258213358 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128940790455 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571258213358 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.5 13.2329268293 215% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.16 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 10.3012195122 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.