The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts given illustrates the variations in the expenditure of a particular UK school per year. From the general perspective, it was found that the major expenses for a year were allocated to Teachers salaries and least being the insurance in all the years.
From the pie charts, it was shown that the budget for insurance increased four times from 2% to 8%. On the other hand, it was observed that the highest budget which was taken up by the teacher’s salaries also increased up to 1991 but the downfall was seen by the year 2001. Similarly, the budget which was allocated for the resources was also improved by 5% in the first decade where there was a fall of about nearly 11% suddenly. Budget expenditure on furniture decreased in the first ten years by 10% but increased drastically in the next decade by 18%. In contrast to all the above, the school’s expenditure decreases gradually in both the decades in the case of wages to other workers of nearly about 13%.
In conclusion, though insurance seems to be the least there was a gradual increase in the budget expenditure in every year and a progressive decrease is observed for wages to other workers and al the other category of expenses fluctuated in the span of these two decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts given illustrates the var...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing the insurance in all the years. From the pie charts, it was shown that t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to other workers of nearly about 13%. In conclusion, though insurance ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, similarly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75909090909 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75099906721 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1454726735 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740989324587 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473375809074 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080987624458 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613148739311 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582142023063 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.