The three pie charts show below the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981,1991 and2001.
The given pictorial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by British school during the 1981, 1991 to after 10 years in the 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall it is evident that, the most significantl spent money maximum in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. While, was spent minimum on the insurance.
As obviously seen from, the pie chart data in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount of four - fifth of total cost for teacher salaries. Moreover, resources and furniture equipment were spent money 15 percentum respectively. Further more, the least amount expenditure an insurance to just under two percentum. In addition to this, the amount of 26 percentum was being spent for other worker salaries.
On the other hand, in the year 1991 and 2001 the teacher salaries were being expenditure cost of upsurged 45% and 50% proportion are respectively. Apart from that, insurance had inclined 3% in the year 1991and 2001 upsurged spent cost to peak 8 %. As manifested, in the circular chart, a significant difference in the school expenditure money can be observed in the charts 1991 and 2001; other worker payment and resources both are amount spent was slightly differenced 22 and 20 proportion. Further moving, school spent money on equipment only five percent from the year 1991, as opposed to the year 2001, which spent 23%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by Briti...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money maximum in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of o...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
...m in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. Whi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. While, was...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...art. Which is far ahead of other terms. While, was spent minimum on the insurance. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount o...
^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he least amount expenditure an insurance to just under two percentum. In addition...
^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ghtly differenced 22 and 20 proportion. Further moving, school spent money on equipmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 22 and 20 proportion. Further moving, school spent money on equipment only fiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08906882591 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71983930525 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7420618294 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140911282582 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485517473677 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650828591799 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10115673658 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355869988867 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.