The three pie charts show below the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981,1991 and2001.
The given pictorial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by British school during the 1981, 1991 to after 10 years in the 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and coherent representation.
As obviously seen from, the pie chart data in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount of four - fifth of total cost for teacher salaries. Moreover, resources and furniture equipment were spent money 15 percentum respectively. Further more, the least amount expenditure an insurance to just under two percentum. In addition to this, the amount of 26 percentum was being spent for other worker salaries.
On the other hand, in the year 1991 and 2001 the teacher salaries were being expenditure cost of upsurged 45% and 50% proportion are respectively. Apart from that, insurance had inclined 3% in the year 1991and 2001 upsurged spent cost to peak 8 %. As manifested, in the circular chart, a significant difference in the school expenditure money can be observed in the charts 1991 and 2001; other worker payment and resources both are amount spent was slightly differenced 22 and 20 proportion. Further, school spent money on equipment only five percent from the year 1991, as opposed to the year 2001, which spent 23%.
Overall it is evident that, the most significant the school expenditure money maximum in the teacher salaries. Which, is far ahead of pie charts. While, least spent were being insurance from 11981 to 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by Briti...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount o...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he least amount expenditure an insurance to just under two percentum. In addition...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferenced 22 and 20 proportion. Further, school spent money on equipment only fiv...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... money maximum in the teacher salaries. Which, is far ahead of pie charts. While, lea...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies. Which, is far ahead of pie charts. While, least spent were being insurance from ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11740890688 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72788633359 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4068659756 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127966563193 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473802196823 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060789959838 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934382290914 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405724650081 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.