School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that who is responsible; parents and tutors, for the growth of intellectual skill in children or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with examples and illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, according to my perspective, trainer is crucial role in children life. They have good trainer to taught the intellectual and good habits of students.Aditionally,Tutor could have training courses for development of student etiquette. Secondly, they have aware students for crime. It is better way to do counseling of children to secure criminal. Teacher had good quality to motivate the children. The best epitome of this is the Hindustan times was conducted survey and written a news said that, a large number of school trainer could have counsell all children on every weekend and developed the intellectual skill in children life.
On other hand, parents is responsible for developed good habits and intellectual skill of children life. Firstly, parents are easily understood behaviour of children. The students are genetically depended upon parents however, in the modern scenario, parents have been swamped in hectic schedule so they could not enough time to spent with children. Moreover, Parents do not punshied her children for any mistakes. The best illustration of this is overseas nation parents are do not spend time with student for grown - up intellectual skills.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing the both options; I believe that there is no single conclusion but still; I take this ground that is an effective clap requires use of both hands and I reckon teacher is "part and parcel" role in the life of children for develop good ettiqutes and aware towards crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Aditionally
...ntellectual and good habits of students.Aditionally,Tutor could have training courses for d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Tutor
... and good habits of students.Aditionally,Tutor could have training courses for develop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the Hindustan times was conducted survey and written a news said that, a large nu...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d survey and written a news said that, a large number of school trainer could have counsell all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... of this is overseas nation parents are do not spend time with student for grown -...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d ettiqutes and aware towards crime.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20658682635 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04500145493 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2496153652 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.294117647 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162252537997 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572438419818 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530338631143 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955299678616 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420153756193 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.