The digital age has changed the way we communicate. People around the world can contact each other, using phones, emails or different Apps. And in this hyperconnected world, face contact is definitely not dead in fact, it is even more valuable. Although face contact is much more effective than other ways of communication, contacting via emails or over the phones is more convenient.
Face contact is more deep and intimate than other communication methods. In face contact, facial expressions and body language can help with building an impactful conversation. Besides, face contact seems more friendly, this way people can build a relationship. Actually what can get through face contact is more than what it can get over the phone or on a computer.
When people can not reach each other, technology offers telephones and computers as the alternatives. It means these are not totally compensated for the face contact. Sometimes people need to get in touch several times within a specific time, it is especially common in business, then face contact is literally not appropriate. Basically, it is a waste of time and money, especially for long distances. While face contact will face the limitation of time and money, then telephones and computers can do this easier, faster and cheaper.
In my opinion, there is no affirmative answer to this question. both methods are vital in different situations. For example, for communicating with family and friends, face contact is crucial. It keeps people close and satisfies their emotional and social needs. It helps to keep people mentally and even physically healthy. And phones or emails can complement it. In the business, phone calls and emails are crucial, even if seen more precisely it is not wrong to say it makes business possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...no affirmative answer to this question. both methods are vital in different situatio...
^^^^
Line 17, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rong to say it makes business possible.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, if, so, then, while, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 292.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22945205479 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84969990486 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4118419717 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.35 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183635092993 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612652762096 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511717085079 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635976479736 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435038344273 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.