TOPIC: The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts display electricity generation from different fuel sources in Australia and France in two years, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the total electricity production in both countries almost doubled over that period. While coal was the largest producer of electricity in Australia in both years. France used nuclear power more in recent years to generate energy.
As is observed from the pie charts, coal was used to produce half of the total 100 units of electricity in Australia in 1980, rising to 130 out of 170 units after two decades, remaining the top position. Initially, 20 units of electricity were manufactured by natural gas and hydropower, while oil was responsible for 10 units. By 2000, the figure for hydropower increased by 16 units, while that of the other sources both declined, to 2 units each.
On the contrary, in France, 90 units of electricity was created at first, which most of which came from coal, natural gas, and oil, at 25, 25 and 20 units respectively. By 2000, the totals doubled, and there saw a growth of five units in oil and a plateau in coal, while natural gas and hydropower reduced to produce only 2 units each. At the same time, nuclear power, with a dramatic increase to 126 units, became the predominant source of electricity generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntries almost doubled over that period. While coal was the largest producer of electr...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore in recent years to generate energy. As is observed from the pie charts, coa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ie charts, coal was used to produce half of the total 100 units of electricity in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71029183266 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559090909091 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.681199589 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216905062455 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950340369531 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736704774056 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163165646008 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835999183313 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.