Topic: the table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturer in the years 2005 and 2006
The given table illustrates the market share of seven different brands of cell phones in all over the world in to consecutive years, 2005 and 2006.
Overall, there was an increase in the percentages of market share of three manufacturers namely Nokia, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson compared to the rest of companies. BenQ Mobile had the lowest market share globally whereas Nokia Mobile secured the top in its rank as number one leading cellphone company worldwide.
Between 2005 and 2006, the market share for Nokia increased slightly by 3%, from 32.5% to 35%. Meanwhile, the Motorola Company climbed moderately, from 17.7% to 21.1%. The percentage for Sony Ericsson manufacturer went up minimally lower than Nokia and Motorola, from 6.3% to 7.4%.
In contrast to the three manufacturers above, the proportion of other companies decreased in market share in the given period of time. Cell phone’s market share of Samsung brand decreased slightly less than other companies, accounted for 12.7% and 11.8% respectively. Likewise, a gentle decline of less than 1% market share could be observed for LG manufacturer, from 6.7% in 2005 to 6.3% in 2006. For other companies that are not listed, while their percentage in 2005 was 19.2%, it went down by 3% in 2006. The market share of BenQ Mobile in 2005 was 4.9%, but it halved in next year to 2.4% in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... decreased in market share in the given period of time. Cell phone’s market share of Samsung b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98237885463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63437596684 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6904508259 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446657284042 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185270604989 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103582981432 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269898536359 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861936873196 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.