transport
The bar chart reveals statistics about the number of travelers who go to work by four separate types of vehicles, namely bus, car, bike and foot during a 40-year period from 1950 to 1990.
Overall, as can be inferred from the graph, at the end of the period, private cars accounted for the majority of transportation in the country. By contrast, bike stood at the lowest position compared with other models of transport.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, we can clearly see that in the year 1950 the first ranking in the transportation was walking due to the underdevelopment of vehicles, followed by the second position, bike, at approximately 37 percent. Additionally, the proportion of bus travelers was around 12 percent lower than that of bike. Car witnessed the lowest number of travelers in 1950.
In details, there was a downward pattern in the years 1970. Meanwhile, bus made up the highest figure for travelers over the course at roughly 37 while walking stood in the lowest position in this field by 12 percent lower than bus. The figure for private car’s customers surpassed all other kinds of transport in 1990, another striking point is that the number of travelers who used cars to travel mirrored that of walking in the year 1950 at 40. There was a relatively similar trend in the proportion of travelers in the group of bike and foot, at 5 and 6 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80497925311 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78448280067 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54356846473 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7424098995 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140027190817 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660003929091 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842758774423 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10743940811 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969404248049 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.