The two line graph compares between men and women for smoking rates in per 1000 person.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the two line graph provided reveals some of the striking similarities between every 1000 men and women in Someland during the period from 1960 to 2000. Generally, it is evident that both genders saw considerable alteration in each period shown.
According to the graph, increasing from approximately 100 in 1960 to almost 200 in 1970, the women who consume cigarettes experience continual growth at slightly higher than 300. This was followed by a period of rapid decline, with smoke rate in the country plunging to a base of 200 in 2000.
The proportion of men smoking tobacco, meanwhile, was dropping progressively, from at precisely 600 in 1960 to 500 in the period of 1975. The latter half of the century brought sustained decline in the figure of man’s smoking rates.
It is important to note that, while women tobacco rate firstly increase at about certain level, following sustained drop, figures for men dropped persistently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-06 | Enkhamgalan | 78 | view |
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history.Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings?Should history stand in the way of progress? 73
- Immigration has a major impact on the society.What are the main reasons of immigration?To what consequences can it lead? 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society.Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Computer are being used more and more in educationDiscuss advantages and disadvantages and give your opinion 61
- The two line graph compares between men and women for smoking rates in per 1000 person.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... at the two line graph provided reveals some of the striking similarities between every 100...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08917197452 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81009406719 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662420382166 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.258631461 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161962864377 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690302778161 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567285996518 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950530129963 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325895649275 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.