The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.

The maps project the establishment of some tourist facilities on an island. Overall, the facilities were null before while there are transportation and accommodation services included now.

On a closer observation, a pier has been placed on the southern part of the island where the ships can be loaded and unloaded. Moreover, a vehicle track, starting from pier, passes through the reception lying in the central part of island and connects the restaurant finally. In addition, a foot trail links the houses which are on both sides of reception to the vehicle track.

Moving into the details, reception which is located in the northern part of island is also just opposite of the pier. As can be observed, a swimming area has been considered near beach in the western part of the island which has been linked by a footpath passing through the accommodation area. Nevertheless, the trees remains unharmed.

In conclusion, the island has been developed for tourism purpose to meet the needs of the tourists.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11976047904 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83896756124 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9597712568 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105660614924 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505502882764 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704547567653 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696165523657 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546965443848 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.