Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
People have preserved their history of culture, art and tradition from ages in the museums which are usually run by the government. Although some museums charge for entrance, other are free to visit. People paying to visit museums have merits and demerits but I think its advantages always overweigh the disadvantages.
First, people account for the prevalence and continuation of museums which would otherwise be useless. They have paid taxes to government for establishing and managing those facilities. Moreover, poor citizens might not afford to pay for their visit of museums and remain away from information about their country's history. Students, for instance, may not come up with entry fee for museums in spite of their interest resulting in getting deprived of such facilities available in a country.
On the contrary, the incentives obtained from museum's admission fees can be used to maintain and upgrade the museum. The antique objects must be cared and reestablished, if harmed, which requires a good fortune. The money from visitors can be used to fulfill such requirements. In addition, the developing countries whose major source of economy is tourism is aided by the museum so they must be protected. The entry charges of museums can be used for safety and security of it. Surveillance cameras and structures of museums, for example, can be properly established through those incentives.
To conclude, although there are some disadvantages of charging for admission of museums, the advantages overweigh those demerits. Overall, small charges on visiting museums can be beneficial not only to visitors but also to the museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87253882305 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7960828575 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372760900539 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136915556509 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983886557313 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25651172339 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742297447653 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.