Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that some museums ask for an entrance fees while others do not require. While collecting admissions to museums might reduce the number of visitors, I believe that being able to maintain museums outweighs its drawback.
On the one hand, charging money from people to enter a museum has a positive result. This is because the money that is collected are used for the development and operations of the museum. Museums need staff to maintain the cleanliness and orderliness and this is made possible through the money from visitors. They use this for paying salaries of the employees and for buying materials to beautify the museum, which in turn attracts tourists. For instance, one of the museums in our country charge admission fee from the visitors at around 50 pesos to pay electricity bills and wages of the employees. I believe that if museums do not do this it will be impossible to maintain museums especially those that do not receive financial assistance from the government.
The major drawback this could cause is the reduction in the number of visitors. If museums charge money from the tourists this would be a reason for them not to visit the museum. Another thing is that the people who belong to the lower class of the society might not be able to see the various collections of the things in the past because they do not money to pay the fee. For instance, when the museum in our nearby town started charging fees the number of local visitors decreased because they can not afford paying the fee. However, this disadvantage could be solved by charging an affordable fees and providing discounts to certain groups of people.
In conclusion, while asking for admission fees might discouraged people to visit museums, however, my opinion without the money collected from them it would be difficult for museums to maintain its operation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 513, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to pay'.
Suggestion: to pay
...s decreased because they can not afford paying the fee. However, this disadvantage cou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, another thing, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92429022082 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58399098758 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482649842271 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2530383589 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381360474859 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153707400799 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779947503233 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268128712848 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571783306039 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.