The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate the changes of an island before and after some tourist facilities were built. The second map is shown in a bigger size.
As is shown in the first map, in the beginning, it was a completely natural island, which was longer from the west to the east. Most of this island was covered with forest except the central part without plants and the westside with a beach.
After being developed, there were a number of changes from the west to the center. Firstly, the beach was developed with access to swimming in the west. To go further east, a large area of accommodation was constructed in the middle of the island. In this area, a reception center was right in the middle, surrounded by a restaurant to its north, two resorts with typically tropical bunglows on its western and eastern sides, as well as a pier to its south, where tourists could go sailing.
Meanwhile, vehicle track was designed around the reception, and footpaths were constructed, which made connection to each of the bunglows and lead directly to the beach.
Different from the areas above, the forest in the east of the island remained the same as in the first map.
Overall, the accommodation and transportation were greatly improved after the construction of new facilities on the island.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...surrounded by a restaurant to its north, two resorts with typically tropical bung...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80630630631 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67482999952 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2503174753 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167271771497 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726110240448 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830022731537 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990155289262 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877289073894 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.