Traveling by trains between cities and countries has become a mainstream means in modern society, especially with the development of fast trains. While some argue that investment should be put to existing transport system, I believe it would be better to invest on new railway constructions.
The currently-used public transport has served for years to support early transportations. The old cursive roads with up and downs not only brought new goods and concepts to remote villages in the mountains but also introduced its culture to the modern society.
However, it might need more capitals to improve the roads above than building new lines to adapt to the advanced technology, such as fast trains. Firstly, cost will be used to move out the old tracks. And then more people and equipments will be needed to do lots of measurements of the capability of this area to see if it suits the new type of tracks. Moreover, it might be quite risky to construct new railway upon the old lines because of the obsolete facilities used years ago.
To build new lines will also offer good chances for development in new districts, which has been proved in most cities in china. A good example will be the city of hefei, where most of the fast trains go to the recently built south railway station and old trains remain heading to the previous destination at hefei station in the north. By separating the use of old and new, both of the northern and southern parts of the city have become more balanced in economy.
To conclude, despite some so-called convenience of the existing transport, i would agree with the opinion that large sums of capitals should be spent on constructing new railway lines mostly considering advanced level of technology and more balanced development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... convenience of the existing transport, i would agree with the opinion that large...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72377189451 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3239505603 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257983600781 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898071147093 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549897075806 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142755180402 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571687569579 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.