Looking at the two maps provides the information on how an island changed before and after certain tourist facilities were built.
Overall, the empty island has undergone significant transformations into a tourist destination with the development of various facilities including a reception area, lodging, restaurant, pier, etc. to draw in more tourism-related activities.
Before the refurbishment, this area was completely encircled by the sea, with the only tourist amenities being a little beach to the west and few coconut trees.
The island has undergone tremendous transformation as a result of the development and building of numerous new infrastructures. The focal point of these facilities is the reception. On the two opposite sides of the reception, two lodging spaces were situated, with a restaurant behind it. Also, to make it easier for the tourists, commuting roads and footpaths have been built. While tracks were built around the reception to link with the restaurant and the pier for driving, the walkways were developed to allow people to walk between the residential areas and the beach where visitors can go swimming. It is interesting to see that natural features have not changed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43915343915 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14029075913 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0207721424 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189498399736 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684797900039 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820541432457 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128468589568 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103691732885 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.