The two maps below show an island before and after the contruction of some tourist facilties.
The diagram representation an island before and after some renovation works for tourists facilities. However, many new facilities have been constructed for tourists and those have been built without affecting the natural resources that much.
Previously, the island was majority with little vegetation on western and eastern side. It is recorded only the vacant area and it is use for the tourists facilities, without the environmental harming. All the construction have been done in the middle. In the western side of the island now available for the swimming, before it was only beach.
Besides, after the construction was complete it converted into beautiful island. The pier have been construct come for the visitors through the boats. The pier is connected with the reception, in the middle, and the restaurant suited extreme north end of the island, with connect with vehicle tracks. On either sides of the reception multiple accommodation are build that are further connected with the footpath. And, the same football goes in the beach.
Overall, the construction was mainly made to facilitate the tourists' stay, visit and amusement and for that, no plants or trees were cut.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r that, no plants or trees were cut.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33862433862 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7705979268 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1243448573 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151820468108 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061204320331 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897776206447 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096439251345 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648338174964 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.