The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given maps of City Hospital in 2007 and 2010 illustrate some changes in the design of road network.

Overall, the surrounding area around the City Hospital has changed remarkably after 3 years of 2007. New features, such as 2 roundabouts have been added while the old bus stoppages and parking site have been replaced in the later design.

From the map of 2007, it can be seen that the place allotted for both staff and public was adjacent to the city road. But in 2010 there was a small change in the parking area which is demonstrated by the separate parking place for staff and public. Additionally, two road junctions were introduced in the map of 2010 which had connected the City Road and the Ring Road to the Hospital Road. Bus stops, which were on both sides of the Hospital Road had been moved to another place which was located on the south-west of the map. Just below the City Hospital. Moreover, road access improved in 2010 which allowed a convenient network from the bus station to the main roads.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-12-07 Cynic 84 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65384615385 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37959668363 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4139887497 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278808201146 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127477729675 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767561882633 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190716233123 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074317517245 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.