The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided map illustrates the changes made in road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. What stands out from the map is that during this time, the City Hospital has seen many changes in its infrastructure.
In 2007, the City Hospital used to have 6 bus stops on both left and right sides of Hospital Road while in 2010, these bus stops were removed completely. Instead, the left side were extended and a new bus station has been constructed.
Car park area used to serve for both staff member and the public. However, two seperate car parks were established for the use of staff and the public. Car park area located on the right side of Hospital road just nearby the busstops while in 2010 this area only belonged to car parking for the employees of the hospital without having any bus stops. Second car park which served only for the public located on the right sude of City Hospital along the turn to Ring Road. Being the last change, two roundabouts were added to both ends of Hospital Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
... 2007, the City Hospital used to have 6 bus stops on both left and right sides of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us stops on both left and right sides of Hospital Road while in 2010, these bus s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49456521739 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25043972809 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9583116093 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196233309254 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985305157278 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910230729544 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153036265035 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640982407458 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.