The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrates how a particular city hospital changed between 2007 and 2010. It can be seen that the areas nearby the hospital observed many changes.
The hospital in 2007 stayed on top of the map surrounded by Ring Road. Hospital Road, which was straight down to the south, was lined with bus stops on both sides. Under the hospital and next to Hospital Road was a car park for staffs and residents.
By 2010, there have been two new roundabouts which were placed on both ends of Hospital Road. The former car park changes to be used by staffs only, along with a big public parking area was built to the right of the hospital. Those bus stops on Hospital Road were pulled down and replaced by a new bus station which was opposite the staff car park. People were able to access to it from the mentioned roundabouts.
To sum up, there were some significant changes of the City Hospital after three years, one of which was more parking area for staffs and residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The maps illustrates how a particular city hospital changed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56818181818 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27136322703 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.682578586 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177242472226 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916254911481 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687852376924 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121705884439 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498579998294 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.