The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The provided two pictures illustrate some main changes taking place to road access to an unnamed city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the city hospital and the Ring Road which surrounds it remained unchanged during the time frame. Another interesting point is that there were several significant changes to the southern side of the hospital, involving intersection upgrades, parking areas and bus facilities.
Looking at the information in more detail, one of the most striking developments to the transport infrastructure is the construction of two new roundabouts at the three-way junction of the Ring Road and the Hospital Rd, and at the four-way intersection of the City Road and the Hospital Rd.
Furthermore, there used to be six bus stops situated along both sides of the Hospital Rd; by 2010, however, they had been demolished to make way for a considerably large bus station to the west of this road. On the opposite side, meanwhile, the original car park for both staff and the public was converted into a staff-only area. At the same time, another public car park was erected on the east of the city hospital and connected with the Ring Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
... Rd. Furthermore, there used to be six bus stops situated along both sides of the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95979899497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80256081334 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.976173922 43.030603864 318% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.5 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283042919704 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139670596949 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123318974135 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188058983686 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104400495785 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.