The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given maps illustrate the road accessibility in the year 2007 and 2010 for a city hospital.
The hospital is located on the north side of the city surrounded by the ring road and an entrance on its south side. The hospital is connected to the city road by means of hospital road. Due to certain issues in 2007, a renovation was performed in the year 2010 which benefited a lot in future.
During the year 2007, the hospital road consisted of many bus stops on both sides of the road which had eventually led to more congestion. After entering the ring road, parking for both public and staff is situated beside the bus stop on the eastern side and was minimal.
After renovation in the year 2010, two roundabouts were constructed at both the ends of hospital road and a huge bus station is set up on the west side to lessen congestion. The parking has been split into two areas where the public parking has been moved towards the east side of hospital and staff parking remains in the same place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...road and an entrance on its south side. The hospital is connected to the city road ...
^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... in the year 2010 which benefited a lot in future. During the year 2007, the hospital ro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49726775956 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40145128167 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9677571938 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227828990386 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121200250215 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759781693679 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166516541033 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669338476466 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.