The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Both maps illustrate the way to access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Overall, there are two major places never change in two years. These places are the city hospital and staff car park. However, there are some additional features that appear on the map of 2010 but not in 2007, these features are Bus station, public car park, and two roundabouts. Furthermore, the bus stop on the map of 2007 has lost on the 2010 map.
According to two maps, the major places which exist in later years can be seen in the city Hospital and staff car park. Change happens to start with a public car park which dissociates oneself from the staff car park in 2007 and appear east direction beside the city hospital in 2010. The additional features emerge in the map of 2010 was Bus station on the west direction near from Hospital road, then roundabout appears as the connector to Bus station. The further additional change was Bus stop in three drops that lost in 2010 map instead of the roundabout.

Votes
Average: 3.6 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, then, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52222222222 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30817120704 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6571943359 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231464632583 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124845750019 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683704518592 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211090921613 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579832340492 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.