two maps show road access to a city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The two maps illustrates pathway to the city hospital by means of road in two time periods(2007 and 2010)
Overall, it can be clearly seen in 2010, hospital road had some new installations such as couple of roundabout as well as a bus station, while the ring road around the hospital had a new public car parking space.
In 2007, there were 3 pairs of bus stop located opposite to each other along the hospital road, it also had a staff and public car park with its entrance south to the hospital road inbetween city road and ring road.
While in 2010, the city hospital plan had many striking changes, firstly, combined car parking space was re-established into seperate public and staff parking space, entrance were along the east and south of the ring road respectively. One roundabout connected city road to hospital road, as the other connected ring road and hospital road. However, bus station had an exit in both of those roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew public car parking space. In 2007, there were 3 pairs of bus stop located o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7987804878 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55133930372 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.8254275509 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.4 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4 5.23603664747 256% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221661021143 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131265579926 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079200227653 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175984072138 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635821718246 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.