The two pictures show a typical japanese office and a typical american office. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two maps contrasting the layout of two offices, one Japanese and the other American.
It is conspicuous that the significant difference between Japanese office and American’s is the vacant space and working environment. Meanwhile, the latter is more likely to be cramped than the former owing to adding more facilities which is dedicated for their job.
In the Japanese office, workers are divided into two groups of six people who sit parallel to one another and share a large rectangle table. Furthermore, each section manager locates in front of 6-worker seats and behind the position of department manager doing a favor for supervising staff working. Eventually, there is a window which is located behind the department manager’s position.
When it comes to a typical American office, meanwhile, has two windows on the left and right side. The right-hand side of the layout is occupied by two section managers and a department manager arranged adjacent from the north to the south,respectively. In the heart of the office, it has totally 8 personal working positions where workers from a section can exchange their work with the others. The left-hand place is utilized for several facilities including the printer copier, storage and two conference rooms while a typical Japanese office does not have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , respectively
...ged adjacent from the north to the south,respectively. In the heart of the office, it has tot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26886792453 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8939169392 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9578504503 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.7 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169976329884 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702703019346 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670669707077 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103705776658 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518920352451 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.