The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’ contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant?
The two pie charts illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of economy of Turkey which provided by eight various industrial areas who was in sixteen years periods during 2000 and 2016.
In overall,husbandry,health care and education fields constituted a major to give in the economy of specific region since others contributed in least amount. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the participation who offered by the all sectors to the given nation’s economy over the periods.
With regards to an initial chart, between 2000 and 2016, farming area was most popular for giving in the economy of particular country which accounted at just over below a quarter (2000) and 14% (2016) followed by leisure, hospitality, trade, utilities and transportation from 17% to 14%. In contrast, an amount of health care and education remained constant at nearly a fifth in both periods.
The second chart proves that construction accounted for 3% for contributing in the Turkey’s economy during 2000 and experienced a little more than a three-folds rise to one in ten in 2016. Likewise, the percentage of manufacturing and government to gave in the given region’s economy was found 12%,9% and 8% respectively from 2000 to 2016. Lastly, a steady increase of 3% observed in the Turkey’s economy which contributed by finance, business and others between 2000(5%) and 2016(8%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , husbandry
...ds during 2000 and 2016. In overall,husbandry,health care and education fields consti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...pecific region since others contributed in least amount. However, there were lots of tra...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, likewise, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34222222222 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3022072678 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595555555556 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5036299174 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.25 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282418746771 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115670460159 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674616622794 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166638588707 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068495583816 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.