The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The given circular charts depict the information about the five sources of energy which had been used by USA during the years 1980s and 1990. The data is calibrated in the per centum.
It can be seen that, In the year of 1980s the USA had used 42% of the oil as the main source of energy. In addition to this, USA used 26% of the total energy from the natural gas. Moreover, the amount of energy that USA had consumed from the three sources: coal, hydroelectric power and nuclear power was 22%, 5% and 5% of the total energy respectively.
Moving ahead, In 1990s the amount of energy consumed from oil by USA was 33% of the total energy and 25% energy had been consumed from the natural gas. While, the remaining amount of energy had been obtained from the coal and nuclear which was 10% and 15% of the total energy respectively.
Overall it is evident that, during both years of 1980s and 1990s the highest amount of energy had been consumed from the oil and lowest amount was consumed from the nuclear power source of energy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1990s'.
Suggestion: In the 1990s
...l energy respectively. Moving ahead, In 1990s the amount of energy consumed from oil ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48148148148 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16999602074 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412698412698 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8121323515 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263933391109 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134957092837 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701968810774 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187771824414 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296904707859 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.