The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The given cyclic charts picturise the information about five main sources of energy provided by usa during the 1980 and 1990.The is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that for the year 1980, oil was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed souce of energy in the USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric power were noticed to be 26%, 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover nuclear energy had a small fraction from rest of the sources of energy.
As far as trend was concerned ,in the late 1990s . Oil was pin pointed at 33% of the total but on the other side natural gas contributed a quarter in the formation of the circular chart . Apart from all this 27% is contributed towards the consumption of coal.Moreover, hydroelectric power and nuclear power had been noticed to be at 5% and 10% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that while collating both of the pie charts, there was an uplift in coal and nuclear power. Hydroelectric power remained static for both the years. However, there was a drop for resouces of oil and natural gas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rovided by usa during the 1980 and 1990.The is calibrated in percentum. It can b...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed souce of e...
^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f energy in the USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric pow...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric power were notice...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ced to be 26%, 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover nuclear energy had a small fraction fro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...energy. As far as trend was concerned ,in the late 1990s . Oil was pin pointed ...
^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s trend was concerned ,in the late 1990s . Oil was pin pointed at 33% of the total...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r in the formation of the circular chart . Apart from all this 27% is contributed ...
^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ributed towards the consumption of coal.Moreover, hydroelectric power and nuclear power ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72251308901 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74370955885 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2559086677 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178396969328 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667250545141 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769806672794 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119377233688 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854661451999 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.