using telephone calls
The supplied bar charts illustrate a number of phoning activity in the UK by minutes calculation in 1995 to 2002. It is separated by three parts, those are for local, national and international, and mobiles.
To begin with, in general description, we can distinguish easily for each category. In 1999, society beats a higher count in local purpose which was almost 100 billions. It seemed like the most attractive way for society to have communication between others. Conversely, the more modern a country is, the more showed off the increasing. In 2002, national and international figure is remarkably boomed up to 61 billions. Followed by using mobiles stuff which also peaked as the dominant than the previous years.
generally, we can pay in more detail that a whole figure showcased the trend’s direction significantly. Local line is remained stagnant to become the central of rising. It won out over the other bar graphs. The lowest rate for this line only reached approximately 71 billions, while the mobiles hit into 1 to 2 billions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
...the dominant than the previous years. generally, we can pay in more detail that a whole...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09248554913 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96483900177 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699421965318 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4183672761 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.4166666667 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0238013766018 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00822135125993 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272671373989 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0125181235058 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177033000374 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.