w

Essay topics:

w?

The graph illustrates the amount of exports from year 2008 till 2013, in the city of Bartonville.
Overall, the total amount of exports went up in the city within the time period. Although the total outlook improved, there was a significant variation among individual products. Goods such as cars and fuels showed decline in exports, whereas palm oil sales sky rocketed in the same time period.
Firstly, we can observe that total exports of Bartonville has increase from $120 million to about $160 million from 2008 till 2013, with a slight drop in year 2010.
It can be observed from the second graph that the sales of fuels and cars have taken a significant hit. Fuel dropped from $25 million to $5 million, while cars dipped down from $15 million to about 10 million, from year 2008 till 2013. On the other hand, palm oil enjoyed a boos in its sale, raising from below $5 million to above $20 million within the same time period.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a boo' or simply 'boos'?
Suggestion: a boo; boos
...2013 On the other hand palm oil enjoyed a boos in its sale raising from below 5 millio...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53939393939 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19259962441 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 165.0 22.4926829268 734% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 749.0 112.824112599 664% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 165.0 22.9334400587 719% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 76.0 5.23603664747 1451% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 82.5 13.2329268293 623% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -70.62 61.2550243902 -115% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.1 10.3012195122 622% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.24 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.4 8.06136585366 179% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.0 10.9970731707 618% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.