The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from on university did after finishing

Essay topics:

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from on university did after finishing

The pie chart illustrates the types of jobs that are held by graduates after finishing their degree in Anthropology, whereas the table provides information about the pay that they receive in various sectors.

Overall, most of the students go on to do full time work after completing studies, while a smaller but significant portion is either unemployed or not documented. Most of the people earn a good amount of money after 5 years of work experience, but the highest earners were government sector workers.

The pie chart shows that the largest number of graduates went on to secure full time jobs, which constitutes 52% of the total. In comparison, only 12% remained unemployed, while information about 8% of graduates remained unkown. A significant amount, about 20%, chose to work partime, with a small portion even perseuing a post graduate degree.

Among those who secured jobs, not all were being paid equally. After 5 years of working, majority of them got a good salary but those working for government got paid considerably more. 50% government employees got paid over $100,000, compared to only 40% freelancers and 30% private workers.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...erall, most of the students go on to do full time work after completing studies, while a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...t number of graduates went on to secure full time jobs, which constitutes 52% of the tota...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15425531915 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77316470984 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643617021277 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4534350438 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141113438153 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537781439943 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500855579825 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085899926029 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052304440419 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.