Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The climate change has become a very controversial topic in the past few decades. While no one disagrees about its dangers, there’s no consensus on how to tackle it. Some believe it should be dealt with at a global level whereas others think it should be sorted out independently by each nation. This essay will look at both of these arguments and explain why I strongly believe with the earlier statement.
The proponents of solving this at a national scale say that it’s easiest way. Trying to implement new environmental policies at a local level is easier, as it basically requires a single order from a court or a parliament. Even though it’s easier, there is no expert input and hence the policies created aren’t up to the mark. Take a look at the Brazil, as it struggles with the deforestation because people there have found numerous loop holes in their local laws aimed at tackling climate change.
Because environmental issues don’t care for man-made boundaries, no effort will be successful to counter it if it isn’t global. First of all, concentrated efforts by all the states will yield a better result than any lone action taken by a single country. Addressing this issue requires scientific knowledge, sophisticated equipment and of course monetary funds. Hence a united struggle will be far superior, as was concluded by UN 2 years ago in Paris meeting. Secondly, all countries aren’t prepared equally to fight this challenge. Some have more resources than others and this can lead to further problems rather than solving one. So in a united struggle, wealthier countries will be able to share money and other resources with less fortunate nations. This will help us address climate change issue more effectively. This was also confirmed by the WHO report that looked into this matter in 2015.
In conclusion, although a local effort may be easier, it’s not going to work. I strongly believe that we need a global mechanism because this issue requires a concentrated effort and sharing of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...equipment and of course monetary funds. Hence a united struggle will be far superior,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02064896755 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74314713524 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613569321534 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.202126363 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5789473684 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200265238776 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549065802203 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729449412838 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118042403038 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667928468954 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.