Writing Cam 8
1. Task 1 cam 8: Pie chart and table
The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given charts show the information about a number of the main factors which lead to the land degradation in general and in 3 different areas in particular during the 1990s.
It is noticeable that the largest part over- grazing which is considered as a primary reason causing the decrease of land quality in the world. The table illustrates that Europe had far higher proprtion of unproductive land than North America and Oceania in 1990s.
The pie chart clearly shows that there is a large propotion of over-grazing over 35% in total. While deforestation and over-cultivation account for two smaller parts, 30% and 28% respectively. The smallest part is other factors accounting for 7% in total.
In term of the data in the table, it is easy to see that the principal element leading to the land deterioration in Europe is deforestation. This accounts for the massive 9.8%, while a mere 0.2% land in North America and 1.7% land in Oceania were destroyed by deforestation. Over-grazing accounts for the vast majority of the causes to the farmland decline in the large group of islands in the South Pacific, about 11.3%. By comparison with Europe and North America It causes only 5.5% and 1.5% land destroyed respectively. Over- cultivation part accounts for a lowest percentage of reasons compared with other areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...ive land than North America and Oceania in 1990s. The pie chart clearly shows that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ly. Over- cultivation part accounts for a lowest percentage of reasons compared w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in fact, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99547511312 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94195604009 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4800212125 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.363636364 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15395081524 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603084977198 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593924001338 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110728202814 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517227060229 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.