You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese, American, Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of time each day that people spent doing activities on holiday in Greece in August 2019 from four various countries.
In general, even though the total time spent by the whole four nationalities was equivalent, their interest in activities was different.
As can be seen from the chart, the favorite activity of both the Chinese and the Americans is reading books, when an American dweller spent five hours a day reading books, higher for a Chinese with eight hours per day. However, they might not be really into having a tour somewhere in the places that they visit because it only takes one hour only in their holiday. Instead of that, both American and Turkish tourists still spend at least 3 hours visiting places and Brazilians 2 hours. The time Turkish and Brazilian tourists enjoyed reading book activity was the same with 4 four hours.
The average amount of time spent at the beaches fluctuates from 3 to 6 hours ascending from Chinese tourists to Brazilian tourists. It can be seen that visiting places was the least preferred activity when the longest time spent on this activity was only 3 hours a day in the case of American and Turkish tourists. It was even lower for the Chinese and the Brazilian tourists, just an hour and two hours a day respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, still, well, at least, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80616740088 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48092335442 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506607929515 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8949039401 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30882771656 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140238750837 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659247863231 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190756933228 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856486178268 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.