You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some lessenvironmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteenEuropean countries.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less
environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen
European countries.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and
make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.

The bar char illustrates how the waste management in the EU chose the different measures, such landfill, recycled or composted, incineration et cetera.

Overall, European countries dispose their waste by above methods, and however landfill was the most prevalent way in Greece, Ireland, the UK, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Finland, and France, while recycled or composted method was used widely in Belgium, Austria, Germany, Sweden, and Netherlands. Also, Luxembourg and Denmark prefer choosing incineration.

In Greece, nearly 90% of waste was disposed by landfill, so this percentage was clearly the maximum among those, which was nine time as Denmark do. Although the minimum percentage of landfill in Denmark, it burns nearly 60% of waste, and therefore no country can surpass this figure in incineration. By contrast, Austria prefer using recycled or composted measure to manage waste, so it was the largest fraction on recycled or composted group transparently.

Additionally, Spain, Belgium, Germany, and Sweden can dispose waste by other way, proportion of unspecific ways keeping in the relative low level, despite Germany disposed about 10%.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64942528736 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85911886919 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.925977601 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.050704899194 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230674694093 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019540909006 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0327159335942 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166983569576 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.