Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Human beings' history is just the history of environmental improvement essentially, and therefore improving environment inspires people to concern this topic. Some people say that individuals' abilities are too weak to improve their living environment, so they prefer depending on governments or big company. However, this essay does not share this views because a dependent person also can benefit for improving the his or hers environment.
Firstly, people play an important part in designing the schedule for improving environment. In other words, either the governments or companies is just a thinking and labor tank rather than that they can improve the environment. Basing on this facts, people can provide some creative ideals to evoke the entire society to concern the environment. To evidence of this, a book, A Sand County Almanac, by Aldo Lepold, evokes American to concern the changing Environment. Therefore, individuals can improve their environment owing to personal features.
Moreover, not only can individuals' features or abilities improve the environment, but also people's right habits and life style benefit for the environment. Firstly, if a person control his or hers such luxury desire as large displacement vehicle, it will reduce emission of carbon dioxide. Moreover, provided people insist classifying their living garbage, the wastes might be disposed easier than do not, so the environment will gain less detrimental effects. Thus, if a citizen keeps good habits, it will improve the environment undoubtedly.
However, some people insist that there is no organization meaning that every dependent man or woman will face insufficient financial budget, so they can not improve the environment well. Nonetheless, in fact, if people are enthusiastic to protect environment, they will do better than that some employee of governments or companies just complete a job without zealous.
To recapitulate what discussed previously, this essay illustrates that people's abilities and living habits will improve their living environment, even through they might face shortage of financial supports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
Human beings history is just the history of environm...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... can improve the environment. Basing on this facts, people can provide some creative...
^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain less detrimental effects. Thus, if a citizen keeps good habits, it will impro...
^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es just complete a job without zealous. To recapitulate what discussed previous...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout zealous. To recapitulate what discussed previously, this essay illustr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70226537217 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00606314337 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6885653838 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194604563404 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766277254332 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410934937165 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117079269112 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394060700642 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.