You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download
copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
You should write at least 250 words.
As the world approaches the information age, people can easily download various resources from the Internet. However, some individuals contest piracy, but other people say knowledge should be transmitted under any situation. This essay prefers supporting the first point rather than the second one because protecting the copyright of works means guarantees the creativity of the entire society.
Transparently, copyright is the most efficient measure to guarantee creativity. Basing on this fact, if human beings were not owned creativity, their civilization would never come up the horizon undoubtedly. As evidence of this, provided that people continue to downloaded copyrighted books and music without any authorization, this will cut down the author's income, resulting in that they have to abandon the creative work. Therefore, there is a shrinking on creativity which will fade away from this planet eventually.
However, people download the resources from the Internet conveniently, benefiting the economy. Admittedly, the freely and conveniently high-quality resource can aid the developing country to improve its science, technology, arts, et cetera. People living in there pirate the resources from the Internet, which is harmful to their creativity, because no one wants to spend time and finance to explore new things under the freely gaining new information. As a result, the difference between the developing countries and the developed states will accelerate sharply.
This essay outweighs limiting the free downloading books and music against that people can download the materials from the Internet freely and occasionally. Not only can copyright protect authors' benefits, but also it can guarantee the creativity of the entire world. Furthermore, lawmakers should make more completely codes to protect the copyright of books and music.
To recapitulate, any piracy should be prevented immediately because this phenomenon continues to spoil the enthusiasm for creativity. Additionally, the legislation should provide more concise and precise acts to protect the copyright.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...y authorization, this will cut down the authors income, resulting in that they have to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79545454545 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00790793073 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600649350649 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.339418447 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183007142918 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607537912428 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386217050191 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107020377672 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202325555336 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.