You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of
tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information
shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates how the waste production continue to change in Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland, Portugal, and the US respectively during the whole period of two decades.
Overall, the US kept the rather high level in waste production taking up the first place during the entire survey time while Japan produce the second largest waste production. Additionally, the waste production of Ireland, Korea, Poland, and, Portugal maintain the relative low level.
In 1980, nearly 131 millions of tonnes(MT) of the waste production is produced by the US, it was clearly the larger than any other countries, and then this figure increased significantly from 151MT in 1990 to 192MT in 2000.
In contrast, the waste production of Japan stood at 28MT in 1980, and then this number grew dramatically to 53MT in the 2000. At the same time, before the waste production of Korea dropped to 19MT in the year 2000, the it almost share the same number(31MT) with Japan, additionally, its data was not given in 1980.
In addition, Ireland, Poland, Portugal kept the relative level of waste production, which the figures are less than 10MT, although the waste production maintain an increasing trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Portugal) must be used with a third-person verb: 'maintains'.
Suggestion: maintains
...f Ireland, Korea, Poland, and, Portugal maintain the relative low level. In 1980, nea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '131 million'.
Suggestion: 131 million
... relative low level. In 1980, nearly 131 millions of tonnesMT of the waste production is pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...Korea dropped to 19MT in the year 2000, the it almost share the same number31MT with J...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shares'?
Suggestion: shares
...to 19MT in the year 2000, the it almost share the same number31MT with Japan, additio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14432989691 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65863476704 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.4924539264 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121997351179 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648859550793 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0117443052784 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734455151257 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00931793632595 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.