Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Indisputably, the climate change has been the considerably debated subject. Apparently, there have been extensive controversies to determine who is responsible to intervene in this issue: individuals or authorities and affluent company. From my perspective, I would affirm that everyone should put their best effort on the crisis.
Urgently, the complication is being more and more concerned by the virtue of the undesirable effects that it exerts on every aspect of human life. Admittedly, the original causes are due to individuals. Anyone, in somewhat circumstances, contribute to the thriving of global warming, the delegate of environmental problem. For instance, the products such as clothes, foods, means of transportation,... etc ought to have been through the manufacturing process in factories which would release waste like gas, litter, ... so on to nature. Subsequently, this is the major profound impact on the enviroment.
Furthermore, consider the scenario that government and companies are exclusive on the mission of seeking the solution. In spite of the plentiful funds, but for the deterrent lack of workforce, the progress can not be accelerated. When any addresses are enforced, eventually, the number of conductors will be the main component which determine whether the result is relevant or not. However the capability of investing from the companies, the abscene of workforce will not be in pursuit of the exponential climbing of climate change. As the issue exacerbate excessively, the accumulation of workforce is the must - done task. Nonetheless, the government and companies should subsidize and offer great prospects to the workforce for a better productivity.
In conclusion, every one should be involved in the quest. Each of us has our special abilities to intervene . the more we contribute, the more significantly it neutralises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... clothes, foods, means of transportation,... etc ought to have been through the ma...
^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Furthermore, consider the scenario that government and companies are exclus...
^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... whether the result is relevant or not. However the capability of investing from the co...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... workforce for a better productivity. In conclusion, every one should be invol...
^^^^
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s has our special abilities to intervene . the more we contribute, the more signif...
^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...as our special abilities to intervene . the more we contribute, the more significan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60915492958 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34211189313 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5480702626 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8421052632 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820835986406 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196789974925 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255788857267 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378282373349 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390520325541 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.